Im not a lawyer or anything but doesnt the licence of OOo says that if someone make a modification it should be under a GPL?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi as I comment a few months back, Telefonica, one of the biggest cell > carriers are selling OpenOffice.org for 3 Euro a month. In return they > get OOo with support, however after this post > http://bandaancha.eu/articulo/6611/telefonica-restringe-version-openoffice > > Is clear that Telefonica is not just modifying OOo but also breaking > trademark rules. They took off .org from many of the dialogues. They > also modify the installer and ask for a service key and they don't > offer the source code and explicitly prohibits redistribution witch is > a big negative for GPL OR LGPL. > > It seems the code is not delegated to components but is part of the > actual build and can't be separated. I for then solicit a motion to > investigate this deeper and determine if Telefonica is indeed breaking > the license and send cease and dissist letter. > > > http://www.telefonica.es/on/io/es/atencion/consultas_y_dudas/contratos/soluciones/openoffice/c_g_openoffice.pdf > > -- > Alexandro Colorado > OpenOffice.org Español > IM: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
