Another avenue to consider in terms of getting more marketplace exposure could be to hold our annual conference concurrently with a conference or expo held by another (larger) organization. In this fashion, we free ourselves from many of the logistical duties of conference coordination and at the same time enable cross-over marketing.

Also, in light of articles such as this
http://www.techweb.com/article/showArticle?articleID=222002611&section=news it would seem highly appropriate to make a strong showing at conferences such as Gov 2.0 in May 2010 as referenced by Drew http://www.gov2expo.com/gov2expo2010/public/cfp/82

Anyway, just another dimension to explore <smile>. And personally, I think it would be totally kewl to have a 24-hour 'around the world' conference that I was excited enough about to want to stay up all night to attend <grin>!!! ~Christine


----- Original Message ----- From: "chao sun" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: [marketing] Virtual OOoCon 2011?



It's useless to discuss the pros and cons of the current OOoCon and the Virtual one, they're all quite straight. the key issue is that which way could benefit us best, certainly the current one, I don't want to wakeup at 2 o'clock in the morning to do the presentation as I am in China. And I don't think I still have the energy to attend any of the presentation afterward.

The idea is that we could simply keep the current OOoCon, that's our annul event. Why should we cancel it? Shall we cancel the Olympics instead.

the Virtual OOoCon could only apply to the specific area, say , European OOoCon, and we could have a Asian one, but only be the complementarity.



Regards

Chaosun

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to