Hi,
in the meeting that we just have at irc (minutes should arrive in
another mail), we had the discussion about where Marmotta should start
to implement the LDP hierarchy:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#fig-ldpc-types
LDP Resource
|
|-- LDP Binary Resource
|
|-- LDP RDF Resource
|
|-- LDP Container
|
|-- LDP Basic Container
|-- LDP Direct Container
|-- LDP Indirect Container
Since the spec says:
6.4.4 LDP servers may accept an HTTP POST of non-RDF representations
(LDP-BRs) for creation of any kind of resource,
LDP-BRs ar enot mandatory. I know the "LDP Binary Resource" should be
easy to implement. But that's not the point for me. For me if about the
scope of the project. Even in the idea is a bit different, it's somehow
related with the old way LMF was managing metadata (RDF) and content
(binaries). And I don't want to open the scope of the project for
converting Marmotta in a Semantic CMS.
But since both Jakob and Thomas had different points of view, I may be
wrong. So I'd like to listen to more opinions about this issue.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Senior Researcher
Knowledge and Media Technologies
Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria
T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925
[email protected]
http://www.salzburgresearch.at
