[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13950478#comment-13950478
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on MARMOTTA-462:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit ca37361e46175be062fc94e658554a73e4343cc4 in marmotta's branch
refs/heads/ldp from [~jakob]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=marmotta.git;h=ca37361 ]
MARMOTTA-462: Implemented support for LDP Implementation Models: LDPR and LDPC
(default)
> Support LDP Client Interaction Model
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: MARMOTTA-462
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-462
> Project: Marmotta
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Platform
> Reporter: Jakob Frank
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: ldp
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> See the spec:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/#h5_ldpc-post-createrdf
> At the moment, the LDP Implementation in Marmotta does not distinguish
> between the different LDP Interaction Models, but supporting them is a MUST.
> We asked for clarification on the w3c list and got the following answer:
> {quote}
> I will give the editors an action to improve on this section, let me put in
> it simplest terms and the intent:
> - LDPRs will only have interaction models of LDPRs. It makes no sense to
> have in the
> - LDPCs could be have as LDPRs or LDPCs. If an LDPC is created by sending
> a request entity body a LDPC and using the "Link: rel=type href=
> http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource";, then that means it behaves as it
> doesn't know about LDPC section. Meaning things like POSTing to it don't
> create members and update membership/containment triples or that when a
> contained resource is deleted, the containment triple is removed.
> {quote}
> To boil it down - creating an LDPC with an LDPR interaction model results in
> a "read-only" Container.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
