OK, I'll change the launchers to include marmotta-ldp by default then. Thanks,
Jakob On 7 April 2014 17:21, Andreas Kuckartz <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with including the LDP module. I am mostly interested in > Marmotta because it is closely following the LDP standardization efforts. > > Cheers, > Andreas > --- > > Sebastian Schaffert: >> I would add the module as default. Even if it might still contain >> experimental code, it is on the webservice layer only and therefore does >> not really affect the stability of the system. OTOH it might give many >> users the opportunity to use the first LDP implementation and is good >> advertisement for us. >> >> Greetings, >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> 2014-04-04 11:28 GMT+02:00 Jakob Frank <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> today I merged in the draft implementation of LDP [1] Sergio and I were >>> implementing over the last weeks into the develop branch. It is >>> compliant with the current working draft [2], but not yet complete. >>> >>> LDP is a separate module in the marmotta-platform and at the moment >>> marked as "experimental". This means it is not included in the >>> marmotta-webapp and the marmotta-installer. >>> >>> If you want to give it a try you need to run >>>> mvn tomcat7:run -Pexperimental,kiwi >>> from the marmotta-webapp dir. >>> >>> We are confident that the module is ready to be included by default, it >>> can be used alsongside with the current R/W LinkedData module. But >>> before removing the experimental tag, we'd like to hear from the >>> community. WDYT? >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> Jakob >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-ldp-20140311/ >>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/LDPImplementationReport/2014-03-11
