Hello Rob,

Thanks a lot!
I just posted the question on legal-discuss@.

yours,
junyue




On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote:

> Note that Apache projects are allowed to rely on LGPL libraries provided
> they are optional dependencies
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
>
> So if most users won't want/need RDF/HT (which I strongly suspect is the
> case) then it would be perfectly fine to have the RDF/HT parser module
> rely on the Java HDT library provided that Marmotta users have to manually
> opt-in to enabling RDF/HT support and it isn't included by default
>
> Btw the "don't look at it" argument has always seemed dumb to me since
> when you get down to it there are only so many ways to do things
> particularly when you are implementing a formal specification like this.
> This is especially true in the case of binary formats where the low level
> code is always going to boil down to something along the lines of "try to
> read next N bytes, interpret those bytes appropriately" so the only real
> differences will be in the higher level APIs you wrap over it
>
> However I would suggest posting a thread on legal-discuss@ to get
> clarification for people better versed in the legal issues involved
>
> Rob
>
> On 12/06/2015 08:46, "Sergio Fernández" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Andreas Kuckartz <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Is that statement ("don't look at it") about LGPL-licensed source-code
> >> (which implements a specification) a result of advise from the Apache
> >> legal team or stated anywhere on the apache.org website ?
> >>
> >
> >No, a personal statement. FMPOV inspiring (looking to) GPL code could be
> >considered a derived work. Therefore affected by the copyleft clauses of
> >the license.
> >
> >But if you think I could be wrong, we can involve ASF Legal for a proper
> >checking.
> >
> >Thanks for your feedback.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >--
> >Sergio Fernández
> >Partner Technology Manager
> >Redlink GmbH
> >m: +43 6602747925
> >e: [email protected]
> >w: http://redlink.co
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to