Hi, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:38 PM, FRANCISCO XAVIER SUMBA TORAL < [email protected]> wrote: > > I think GeoSPARQL support must be optional, because its gonna be annoying > to any person who wants to use MARMOTTA (they have to install PostGIS). In > any case people who wants to use GeoSPARQL is because they know the > standard for representation or querying. And about the schema if there is > a new feature we have to update these changes for GeoSPARQL module then > they could update in runtime. >
That was my point, and where I focus my work on MARMOTTA-584 branch from your contribution. The issue is that such goal is not that easy in the current setup, and I expect issues on schema version in future update. But anyway if everybody agrees on making it completely optional, I'll try to find some time to resume that refactoring and see if it's actually possible. Thanks for your feedback, Francisco. -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
