No, sorry, currently we have no plans to extend the SPARQL support to those two missing specs.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Peter Bruhn Andersen < [email protected]> wrote: > > On the Apache Marmotta home page it is said that SPARQL 1.1 Entailment > Regimes and Federated Query are not yet supported. > > > That rises a few questions: > > What are the plans to implement these two missing parts of the SPARQL > specification? Are there any current and active projects and – if so – when > will the results be implemented? > > Do Marmotta currently have a partly implementation of the SPARQL 1.1 > Entailment Regimes? And if so which one? > > Looking at the tests that is used in depressiveRobot’s article ‘SPARQL and > the RDF Dataset: specification vs. implementation’ [1] how would you expect > Marmotta to perform? > > Regards, > > Peter > > > [1] http://depressiverobot.com/2015/07/29/sparql-datasets.html > > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: [email protected] w: http://redlink.co
