> If it is different, Jeen would probably appreciate the contribution also.

These are two different specs (neither is a recommendation), but the
LDPatch option has at least some uptake with LDP users, due to its origins
as output of the LDP WG.

For my organization, an LDPatch implementation would be eagerly welcomed.

For reference, the two specs are:

https://afs.github.io/rdf-patch/
https://www.w3.org/TR/ldpatch/

--

Tom Johnson
Metadata & Platform Architect
Digital Public Library of America

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Peter Ansell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
> RDF4J has an issue open to add an implementation of LDPATCH, but not
> sure if that is the same as the RDFPATCH that you are referring to.
>
> https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/issues/86
>
> If it is different, Jeen would probably appreciate the contribution also.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 23 June 2016 at 18:35, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Giuseppe,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Giuseppe Loseto <
> [email protected]
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> If you think to switch to the RDF4J <http://rdf4j.org/> project
> (instead
> >> of
> >> OpenRDF Sesame) in the next release, we developed a modified version of
> >> marmotta-util-rdfpatch:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/sisinflab-swot/marmotta-util-rdfpatch-rdf4j
> >
> >
> > Currently we're about releasing Marmotta 3.4.0 still using Sesame 2.7.x.
> > Once we get that release out we would explore the migration many new
> > things, Java 8 and to RDF4J 2.x are the most important.
> >
> > For now, we forked only a subfolder of the entire Marmotta project.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for the pointers.
> >
> > Do you think there could be interest in RDF4J to contribute rdfpatch
> module
> > to the upstream project? Because from the Marmotta perspective, we
> > developed that because we needed, but we're happy to get it out.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: [email protected]
> > w: http://redlink.co
>

Reply via email to