One thing to note is that the current OSGi bundle definitions make it difficult to use Marmotta in an OSGi environment.
For example: the code base currently uses version 19 of Guava [1], but the import definition for marmotta-commons requires versions 14-16 of guava [2]. There is also at least one module (ldclient-api) that exports the wrong packages (either via misspelling or by just by including the wrong library packages) [3] It is possible to work around this in OSGi, but it requires some maven gymnastics, explicitly embedding the marmotta dependencies in my code, which sort of defeats the purpose of modularity. There is a PR that addresses this here: https://github.com/apache/marmotta/pull/22 It would be great to see this sorted out for 3.4.0. Thanks! Aaron [1] https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/parent/pom.xml#L622 [2] https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/commons/marmotta-commons/pom.xml#L81 [3] https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/libraries/ldclient/ldclient-api/pom.xml#L44-L46 > On Nov 20, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Sebastian Schaffert > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I did some (mostly automatic) code cleanups across the Marmotta source tree > as a preparation. Caught a couple of bugs on the way, not sure how much > impact they had before. > > What's the timeline for releasing 3.4.0? Any missing features? > > Sebastian > > Sebastian Schaffert <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 9. Nov. > 2016 um 20:21 Uhr: > >> Hi Sergio, >> >> Thanks for pushing this forward. I can do something next weekend (in 10 >> days). I am anyways oncall and need to stay at the computer. >> >> Cheers >> >> Sebastian >> >> Mark A. Matienzo <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 9. Nov. 2016, >> 17:37: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've got limited time to contribute patches directly but I'd be happy to >> assist with code review. >> >> --mark >> >> -- >> Mark A. Matienzo <[email protected]> | http://anarchivi.st/ >> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jakob Frank <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Sergio for bringing this up - a release is indeed long overdue! >>> >>> * MARMOTTA-534 is something annoying that is with us for too long >>>> >>> This login-form issue is really annoying - thanks to @thomas who >>> volunteered to take care of it! >>> >>> >>>> * We have some KiWi issues (MARMOTTA-640, MARMOTTA-651, MARMOTTA-652) >> we >>>> should fix. >>>> >>> I fear these are really tricky. Diving into the SPARQL to SQL translation >>> requires quite some effort... >>> >>> >>>> * I shifted MARMOTTA-584 to 3.5.0 since it introduces a db schema >> change >>> we >>>> can't support in all databases, therefore requires major work. >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>>> * I'd see we should also shift the Sesame upgrade (MARMOTTA-635) >>>> >>> +1 - i fear upgrading sesame (or even switch to rdf4j) will cause major >>> disruptions in the code, especially when it comes to the test-suites... >>> >>> Let's see if we can make some progress towards 3.4.0, >>> best, >>> Jakob >>> -- >>> Jakob Frank >>> | http://redlink.co >>> | m: +43 699 10588742 <+43%20699%2010588742> | e: [email protected] >>> | http://at.linkedin.com/in/jakobfrank
