Just thinking about your playlist's example, I think that the concept of strong containment does not seem to be correct. Apart from the raised issue about container's versioning, fixed in ISSUE-3,how does LDP manage resources related to those that are deleted in the container, for example with strong relationships between entities such as equality, inclusion, etc. .? Does it need a "super partes" container which traces all the relations between entities? Does it need a mechanism for notification?
Raffaele. On 20 December 2012 21:10, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > What do people think about LDP Containers? > > The LDP-WG has debating "containers" for ages and it is still going on. > At the face-to-face they decided on "strong containment" meaning if you > delete the container, then the resources in the container also gets > deleted. That is, there is management of resources. > > Links to un-managed things don't fit this model very well, if the links > are in the same LDP platform. > > (think of playlists with songs from your music library in them) > > Any insights here? > > Andy >
