On 6 February 2013 19:50, ASF IRC Services <[email protected]> wrote: > Members present: westei, wastl, tkurz, jfrank, wikier > > ---------------- > Meeting summary: > ---------------- > > 1. Preface > > 2. memento > a. tkurz will send a report to sesame about the problems with sparql result > writer and rdf 1.1 (tkurz, 2) > > 3. reasoner > > 4. aob > a. document the jira workflow in the wiki (wastl, 4) > b. http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/IssueWorkflow (jfrank, 4) > c. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/marmotta/logo/ (wastl, 4) > d. ask infra about the expected date to solve INFRA-5624 (wikier, 4) > > > -------- > Actions: > -------- > - tkurz will send a report to sesame about the problems with sparql result > writer and rdf 1.1 (tkurz, 09:11:35) > - document the jira workflow in the wiki (wastl, 09:32:40) > - ask infra about the expected date to solve INFRA-5624 (wikier, 09:39:17) > > IRC log follows: > > > # 1. Preface # > 09:05:12 [wikier]: topics? > 09:05:42 [tkurz]: memento > 09:05:51 [wastl]: reasoning (short progress report) > 09:06:50 [tkurz]: any other topic? > 09:07:05 [wikier]: no from my side > 09:07:20 [wastl]: Jakob? > > > # 2. memento # > 09:07:27 [jfrank]: none > 09:07:50 [tkurz]: just read the updated version of the menento protocol > 09:07:59 [tkurz]: today I will start implementing > 09:08:14 [tkurz]: If the bugs allow it > 09:08:27 [wastl]: there are no bugs :) > 09:08:35 [tkurz]: yes there are ;) > 09:08:42 [jfrank]: i think i heard that before... > 09:08:52 [wikier]: xD > 09:09:05 [wikier]: tkurz: sorry for the issue yesterday > 09:09:07 [tkurz]: np > 09:09:20 [wikier]: finally I reverted the huge commit with the license > 09:09:42 [tkurz]: just fixed some other stuff yesterday regarding skosjs, > user webservice, sparql result writer, etc > 09:09:57 [tkurz]: so that's it from my side > 09:10:27 [jfrank]: did you file an issue to seasame about the result writer? > 09:10:50 [jfrank]: s/sea/se > 09:11:05 [tkurz]: not yet. I will do that > 09:11:35 [tkurz]: #action tkurz will send a report to sesame about the > problems with sparql result writer and rdf 1.1
I would be interested to hear about these. I have been working on the sparql result writers recently, and I added another feature today, but issues with it are always interesting. https://bitbucket.org/openrdf/sesame/pull-request/57/ses-1054-ses-1724-integrate-tuple-and > 09:11:42 [wastl]: +1 > 09:11:57 [jfrank]: +1 > 09:11:57 [wikier]: +1 > 09:12:22 [wastl]: maybe you should mention that this is not only a Sesame > issue > 09:12:42 [wastl]: it is an inconsistency between the SPARQL spec and the RDF > 1.1 spec Sesame doesn't currently support the RDF-1.1 working draft, however, I opened an issue to track the necessary changes. https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-1720 > 09:13:07 [tkurz]: okay. I will check this > 09:13:42 [wikier]: a sync issue between boths specs, right? > 09:13:50 [wastl]: yes, see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-json-20121108/#select-results > 09:13:57 [wastl]: section 3.2.2 > 09:14:27 [wastl]: and the SPARQL XML result format is still the same as for > SPARQL 1.0 > 09:15:07 [wastl]: it is not exactly an inconsistency, just underspecified > 09:15:20 [wikier]: aja > 09:15:20 [wastl]: the case with datatype and language is missing in the spec > 09:16:19 [wastl]: ok, anything more regarding this topic? > 09:16:59 [tkurz]: no > 09:17:05 [wastl]: ok > > > # 3. reasoner # > 09:17:13 [wastl]: quick progress report > 09:17:35 [wastl]: - persistence layer is working (i.e. storing/loading > programs, rules, justifications, ...) > 09:18:04 [wastl]: - this morning I will work on translation from rule query > patterns to SQL (partly working already) > 09:18:12 [wastl]: - this afternoon I will do the reasoning SAIL > 09:18:22 [wastl]: - tomorrow integration back into LMF > 09:18:49 [wikier]: cool > 09:19:04 [wastl]: please do not do big changes that affect also the triple > store, because I am working in a separate branch and this would be merge hell > 09:19:27 [wastl]: so I have a lock on the kiwi/ components for now :) > 09:20:29 [wastl]: that's it from my side, so I hope we can have the system > complete again by tomorrow evening and prepare the Lucy demo > 09:20:57 [tkurz]: okay. next topic > 09:21:12 [tkurz]: ? > 09:21:20 [wastl]: none for me > 09:21:27 [wikier]: nothing specific... > > > # 4. aob # > 09:21:35 [wikier]: aob? > 09:21:35 [wikier]: ah, yes, wiki > 09:21:35 [wastl]: short note: > 09:21:37 [wikier]: see MARMOTTA-3 > 09:21:42 [wikier]: MARMOTTA-3 > 09:21:57 [wikier]: I migrated some content yesterday to the apache wiki > 09:22:12 [jfrank]: so this issue can be closed? > 09:22:12 [wastl]: great > 09:22:20 [wikier]: but I'd prefer to wait until the code importation the week > on 18th > 09:22:42 [wikier]: who has access to the wii? > 09:22:50 [wikier]: I know that wastl and jfrank > 09:22:50 [wikier]: tkurz? > 09:23:00 [wastl]: I have > 09:23:34 [tkurz]: I think i have. Let's try > 09:23:57 [tkurz]: nope > 09:23:59 [wikier]: I just need to know your username to add karma to you > 09:24:34 [wikier]: tkurz: > http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/FrontPage?action=newaccount > 09:24:43 [wastl]: did you copy the jira workflow already from Sling? :) > 09:25:21 [tkurz]: okay. my account name is tkurz > 09:25:28 [wikier]: we'd just need to add a couple of additional satates > 09:25:35 [wikier]: states > 09:25:35 [wikier]: do we want? > 09:25:50 [wastl]: I think they are already default > 09:26:06 [wastl]: no need to add them > 09:26:42 [wastl]: ok, no need to hurry > 09:26:50 [wastl]: I'd briefly like to mentioin > 09:26:51 [jfrank]: really? test/doc required is default? > 09:26:58 [wastl]: yes > 09:26:59 [wikier]: the also have "Documentation Required" and "Testcase > Required" > 09:27:05 [wikier]: > http://sling.apache.org/site/issue-tracker.html#IssueTracker-IssueStates > 09:27:23 [wikier]: tkurz, westei: added karma at the wiki > 09:27:35 [tkurz]: thx > 09:27:42 [westei]: thx > 09:28:04 [wastl]: wikier: these states are in the Apache default, AFAIK > 09:28:49 [wikier]: this is what we have now > 09:28:50 [wikier]: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/608222/tmp/jira-workflow.png > 09:29:27 [wikier]: the default jira workflow > 09:29:30 [wastl]: ok > 09:29:42 [wastl]: so no need to hurry, keep it for the future > 09:30:04 [wikier]: with my user I cannot change it > 09:30:07 [wikier]: sure > 09:30:11 [wikier]: ok > 09:30:18 [jfrank]: we should document our agreement on closing/resolving > issues > 09:30:32 [wikier]: +1 > 09:30:34 [wastl]: yes > 09:31:02 [wikier]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aissues-panel > 09:31:02 [wastl]: it is in the mail archives already, but should move into > the wiki > 09:31:32 [tkurz]: westei made a good recommendation for the workflow in the > mailing list > 09:31:40 [wastl]: ok, can we close this topic? I have another one and we > already discussed it on the list > 09:32:02 [wikier]: I've just closed the single two resolved issues that were > not code > 09:32:24 [tkurz]: yes. but we should document the workflow in the wiki asap > 09:32:32 [wikier]: which is what jfrank basically points > 09:32:40 [wastl]: #action document the jira workflow in the wiki > 09:32:54 [jfrank]: #link http://wiki.apache.org/marmotta/IssueWorkflow > 09:33:02 [wastl]: maybe we can create an issue for it > 09:33:03 [wastl]: ok > 09:33:09 [wastl]: so done :) > 09:33:24 [jfrank]: no content yet... > 09:33:47 [wastl]: copy from Sling for now, and we add the additional states > later > 09:34:34 [wastl]: now let me finally talk about > 09:34:39 [wastl]: MARMOTTA-5 > 09:34:47 [wastl]: the logo > 09:35:03 [wastl]: I have checked in all logo files (bitmaps and vector > sources) > 09:35:17 [wastl]: to the repository for the marmotta website > 09:35:34 [wastl]: you can find everything here: > 09:35:39 [wastl]: #link > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/marmotta/logo/ > 09:36:24 [wastl]: includes icons (ICO and PNG format), the logo itself, and a > powered-by version of the logo > 09:36:54 [tkurz]: nice. as soon we have a website we should offer a page with > all the logos > 09:37:09 [wastl]: a propos: website :) > 09:37:24 [wastl]: should we ask again at infra? > 09:37:39 [wastl]: they said "not before 1st February", but today is already > 6th > 09:37:39 [wikier]: still awaiting for INFRA-5624 > 09:37:54 [wikier]: I pointed it in the IPMC report > 09:38:17 [wikier]: I'm not sure how difficult is to setup a new cms > instance... but, you know, not so long > 09:38:39 [wastl]: of course they have other things to do as well, but the > website is very important > 09:38:48 [wikier]: I'll try to ask at #asfinfra again > 09:38:50 [wastl]: maybe I add a comment to the issue > 09:39:17 [wikier]: #action ask infra about the expected date to solve > INFRA-5624 > 09:40:32 [tkurz]: perfect. aob? > 09:40:39 [tkurz]: 40 min .... > 09:41:09 [jfrank]: another jira... > 09:41:25 [jfrank]: we have several new feature issues scheduled for v2.6... > 09:42:17 [wastl]: which ones? > 09:42:24 [jfrank]: new features should go to version 3.1 > 09:43:11 [wastl]: there are only two > 09:43:11 [jfrank]: MARMOTTA-60 > 09:43:17 [jfrank]: MARMOTTA-61 > 09:43:33 [wastl]: I only see > 09:43:39 [wastl]: MARMOTTA-18 > 09:43:47 [wastl]: and MARMOTTA-19 > 09:44:02 [wastl]: and both are not scheduled for 2.6 > 09:44:09 [wikier]: mine probably > 09:44:26 [wikier]: part of ldp draft implementation > 09:44:34 [wikier]: which we could release at 2.6 as experimental > 09:44:47 [wastl]: +1 > 09:44:48 [tkurz]: +1 > 09:45:09 [wastl]: they are not really new features, they are a part towards > Marmotta > 09:45:18 [wastl]: which we claim to be a LDP platform implementation > 09:46:17 [wikier]: but I see jfrank's point.. maybe I should started all ldp > in a separate branch > 09:46:32 [wikier]: something to improve when moving to marmotta > 09:46:54 [wastl]: well, I think the first implementation needs to be there at > 3.0 > 09:47:17 [jfrank]: why? > 09:47:17 [wastl]: so I don't mind having it experimental in 2.6 > 09:47:26 [wastl]: because we say we are the LDP implementation :) > 09:47:32 [wikier]: and, since from 2.6 to 3.0 no new code will go in, we need > it as 2.6, right > 09:48:26 [wastl]: no new code, but bug fixes and adaptations yes > 09:49:33 [wastl]: ok, can we stop the meeting now? > 09:49:40 [wikier]: +1 > 09:49:49 [tkurz]: +1 > 09:49:50 [jfrank]: to close this topic: plz think twice before adding new > issues to 2.6 > 09:49:57 [jfrank]: @close: +1 > 09:50:04 [wikier]: ok >
