Hi Nandana, thanks for pointing this out. Actually these files are added by the Maven OneJar Plugin, which builds the jar file for the LDPath CLI. I was not aware that it adds additional source files to the jar file that are not from the project. To solve this issue, I propose that I create a new release build including the license that you pointed out. Do you think it is necessary to again restart the vote afterwards?
Greetings, Sebastian 2013/3/21 Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nandana....@gmail.com> > Hi all, > > Kudos for all the hard work pushing forward the release and sorry for not > being able to check and provide feedback earlier on. I am a bit stuck > catching up stuff after one week of travelling. > > One question, ldpath-3.0.0-incubating.jar (inside > apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.tar.gz) contains some source files > from http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/. Was this intentional ? > > I find no reference to one jar licence in the LICENCE.txt > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > [1] - http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/one-jar-license.html > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Fabian Christ < > christ.fab...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > > > 2013/3/20 Fabian Christ <christ.fab...@googlemail.com>: > > > Summary vote: 0 (for the moment) because I am unsure about the rat > > > check. At least I am not really convinced that the license headers are > > > fine in all cases. > > > > After the very constructive discussions on the RAT topic I came to the > > conclusion that the podling is handling the license headers in a > > profound way. > > > > Therefore, I withdraw my previous +0 vote and vote with +1 for the > release. > > > > -- > > Fabian > > http://twitter.com/fctwitt > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nandana Mihindukulasooriya >
