I think we must have the tag created, then is easier to check. And git
allow to remove tags. So definitely the order of steps 6 and 7 is right.
On 22/03/13 18:04, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi Andy,
this is only possible if I do "Step 6", i.e. push my local repository to
the upstream repository - this is what the discussion was about. :-)
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/3/22 Andy Seaborne<a...@apache.org>
On 22/03/13 15:56, Jakob Frank wrote:
Not sure whether this is possible:
As Andy said [1] one of the checks to do before voting should be:
if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproduceable sources?
It is possible:
git checkout 3.0.0-incubating
mvn clean install
Andy
Best,
Jakob
[1]<
https://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
marmotta-dev/201303.mbox/%**3C5146D72F.4000703%40apache.**org%3E<https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-marmotta-dev/201303.mbox/%3C5146D72F.4000703%40apache.org%3E>
On 22 March 2013 15:13, Fabian Christ<christ.fab...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
2013/3/22 Sebastian Schaffert<sebastian.schaff...@gmail.com**>:
6. Push Local GIT to Upstream
=======================
Great docu! Just a question out of interest. Should step 6 be made
before the vote has passed? IIUC step 6 publishes the updated versions
to the remote server. So after this step the version numbers are
increased for everyone. Now, imagine the vote will not pass. How will
you decrease the version numbers to revert the change (rollback the
release)?
With SVN I always have the problem that the versions are updated
before the vote has passed. That makes a rollback a bit tricky and
error prone. With GIT it seems that you have the tool that would make
it possible to wait for updating the versions after the vote has
really passed. Just move step 6 after step 7.
Best,
- Fabian
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
--
Sergio Fernández
