[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13616143#comment-13616143
]
Andy Seaborne commented on MARMOTTA-177:
----------------------------------------
Slight caution about LUBM - it isn't considered to be very informative. The
queries are just BGPs and the data not very connected.
See also:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sparql-query-bm/
> SPARQL benchmark
> ----------------
>
> Key: MARMOTTA-177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-177
> Project: Marmotta
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Triple Store
> Affects Versions: 3.0-incubating
> Reporter: Jakob Frank
> Assignee: Sergio Fernández
> Labels: benchmark
>
> (copied from https://code.google.com/p/lmf/issues/detail?id=21)
> As soon as the new SPARQL engine is finished, we must evaluate its
> performance.
> Some benchmarks that we could use:
> * http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/
> * http://swat.cse.lehigh.edu/projects/lubm/
> * http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~mschmidt/docs/sp2b.pdf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
