Hi Andy, you are right, the header should not be there (and the NOTICE file also mentions the MIT license correctly). The reason why this was automatically added is probably that the file did not have its own license header before. I begin regretting a bit the use of the license header plugin ...
Sergio, can you please re-check all 3rd party source files whether they have been updated by the plugin incorrectly? Greetings, Sebastian 2013/3/28 Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> > platform/marmotta-sparql/src/**main/resources/web/admin/**editor/sparql/ > flint-editor.js > > has the Apache contributed software header on it. It says it's under a > contributor license agreement but it's not is it? > > Flint is recorded as MIT-licenced > > (Other flint-originated files seem to be the same.) > > Has automation accidentally relabelled it? > > Has this happened elsewhere? > > Andy >
