Hi Nandana,

On 04/04/13 14:27, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
I took a quick look at the LICENCE file and the NOTICE file that will go to
the source distribution. It looks good ( though some of the copyright
statements might not be necessary in the NOTICE when the dependency source
is properly annotated according to "elements such as the copyright
notifications embedded within BSD and MIT licenses need not be duplicated
in NOTICE -- it suffices to leave those notices in their original
locations." but I think we can live with it).

Yes, according http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps

"Under normal circumstances, there is no need to modify NOTICE."

But I find useful to have it list them there, we could thought it away if it'd be a problem

You will give us sometime to review the LICENCE file and the NOTICE file of
the binary distribution too before starting the vote, right ?

Sure! This morning I was working on the installer, these are the LICENSE and NOTICE for its distribution:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-marmotta.git;a=blob;f=launchers/marmotta-installer/src/main/resources/installer/LICENSE.txt;h=ba7be792c097b0252d98aedbbe6fc7e45e90f72f;hb=HEAD

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-marmotta.git;a=blob;f=launchers/marmotta-installer/src/main/resources/installer/NOTICE.txt;h=6bd83fe6948b7762ec653ab9a091bc0b8e7cdb00;hb=HEAD

I'd really appreciate if someone could tell me in this would be valid, or I need to change something.

Thanks!

Cheers,

--
Sergio Fernández

Reply via email to