On 10/09/2013, ASF IRC Services <asf...@wilderness.apache.org> wrote:
> Members present: westei, AndyS, jfrank, dglachs, sschaffert, ansell, wikier
>
> ----------------
> Meeting summary:
> ----------------
>
> 1. Preface
>
> 2. 3.1.0-incubating release preparation
> a. shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77, MARMOTTA-67,
> MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182, MARMOTTA-228 and MARMOTTA-248 to
> version 3.2 (wikier, 2)
> b. 17 issues shopuld be fixed for 3.1-incubating: MARMOTTA-284,
> MARMOTTA-213, MARMOTTA-300, MARMOTTA-301, MARMOTTA-232, MARMOTTA-28,
> MARMOTTA-149 MARMOTTA-236 MARMOTTA-225 MARMOTTA-283, MARMOTTA-208,
> MARMOTTA-199, MARMOTTA-205, MARMOTTA-155 , MARMOTTA-231, MARMOTTA-110 and
> MARMOTTA-280 (wikier, 2)
>
> 3. AOB
>
>
> --------
> Actions:
> --------
> - shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77, MARMOTTA-67,
> MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182, MARMOTTA-228 and MARMOTTA-248 to
> version 3.2 (wikier, 08:38:22)
>
> IRC log follows:
>
>
> # 1. Preface #
> 08:05:59 [sschaffert]: topics?
> 08:06:04 [wikier]: help at http://www.apache.org/dev/asfbot.html
> 08:06:12 [wikier]: for me the main topic is the release preparation
> 08:06:26 [wikier]: so let's start with it
> 08:06:29 [wikier]: and later check for aob
> 08:06:34 [wikier]: ok?
> 08:06:42 [sschaffert]: ok
>
>
> # 2. 3.1.0-incubating release preparation #
> 08:06:56 [wikier]: ok
> 08:07:04 [wikier]: checking jira
> 08:07:04 [wikier]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:07:11 [wikier]: 17 open issues
> 08:07:19 [wikier]: 7 must be fixed
> 08:07:34 [wikier]: the other we should discuss what to do for this release
> 08:07:49 [wikier]: (7 regarding priority)
> 08:08:19 [wikier]: what do you think?
> 08:08:20 [sschaffert]: ok, 284 might be fixed already with the many changes
> that I did for passing the Sesame testsuite
> 08:08:49 [sschaffert]: but for the protocol: before we release I'd like you
> to do some extensive additional tests
> 08:09:04 [wikier]: MARMOTTA-213 is tricky, but I take care
> 08:09:27 [sschaffert]: as you might already know, for passing the Sesame
> testsuite I had to do some critical changes, particularly regarding
> .equals() and .hashCode()
> 08:09:50 [wikier]: yes, that might requires proper testing
> 08:09:51 [sschaffert]: this can have effects in Set and Map structures, so
> please test with many different scenarios
> 08:10:14 [sschaffert]: can I briefly summarize the solutions here?
> 08:10:51 [wikier]: please
> 08:11:00 [sschaffert]: since the discussion on .equals() and .hashCode() is
> still open on Sesame, I did a different solution for us
> 08:11:06 [wikier]: but briefly ;-)
> 08:11:06 [sschaffert]: yes
> 08:11:30 [sschaffert]: the issue is that Sesame forces a triple semantics on
> .hashCode and .equals not taking into account the context
> 08:11:56 [sschaffert]: so as a solution I introduced in marmotta-commons a
> StatementCommons class
> 08:12:21 [sschaffert]: with utility methods that allow you to create
> tripleSet, quadrupleSet, tripleMap and quadrupleMap, using the different
> semantics for hashCode and equals
> 08:12:52 [wikier]: hi ansell
> 08:12:59 [ansell]: hello
> 08:13:03 [sschaffert]: using Guava's "Equivalence" and a custom collections
> library called Javolution - source code included for the moment in
> marmotta-commons
> 08:13:37 [wikier]: ansell: sschaffert is summarizing the issues with have
> with the semantics of .equals() and .hashCode() in the sesame tests
> 08:13:41 [sschaffert]: so if you need a Collection for statements, first
> think whether you need triple or quadruple semantics, and then use the
> utility methods in StatementCommons to create the collection
> 08:13:50 [sschaffert]: (already done)
> 08:13:58 [sschaffert]: (summarizing)
> 08:15:13 [wikier]: such change could have several lateral effects, so we
> must test it before include in the release
> 08:15:43 [sschaffert]:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-marmotta.git;a=blob;f=commons/marmotta-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/marmotta/commons/sesame/model/StatementCommons.java;h=c04e7be4cd16b3360ca56ba3ba90f80b6e81d9d0;hb=refs/heads/develop
> 08:16:13 [sschaffert]: yes, but we need to include it because otherwise we
> don't pass the Sesame tests :)
> 08:16:20 [wikier]: right
> 08:16:28 [wikier]: but...
> 08:16:35 [sschaffert]: I changed it in all places that I was aware of,
> mainly the internal data structures in KiWi
> 08:16:43 [wikier]: can we do more on testing for warranty no lateral effects
> somewhere else?
> 08:16:59 [wikier]: we must check that
> 08:17:29 [sschaffert]: well, the test suites we pass, but as I said, I'd
> like to have some long-term testing with systems that are not immediately
> cleaned up after test
> 08:17:36 [wikier]: I guess MARMOTTA-300 could be related
> 08:17:45 [sschaffert]: not sure
> 08:17:52 [sschaffert]: should actually not
> 08:18:01 [wikier]: we'll see...
> 08:18:22 [sschaffert]: the only effect you might have through the change is
> that some triples with different contexts will appear as one
> 08:18:23 [wikier]: ok, so for now should be fine?
> 08:18:44 [sschaffert]: yes, and if you encounter problems, remember to use
> StatementCommons.newQuadrupleSet()
> 08:18:53 [wikier]: are actually one triple, different quads
> 08:19:00 [jfrank]: to wrap up: java-collections with Statements/KiWiTriples
> are dangerous
> 08:19:14 [ansell]: the sesame compliance tests contain checks for both the
> presence and absence of context
> 08:19:14 [jfrank]: that's the message?
> 08:19:29 [ansell]: but yes, using HashSet is not recommended
> 08:19:31 [sschaffert]: not dangerous but the semantics needs to be
> considered
> 08:19:44 [ansell]: I have in the past used TreeSet with a custom comparator,
> but that is much slower than HashSet
> 08:19:52 [wikier]: ansell: marmotta has a default context, not null, that
> was something tricky sschaffert and jfrank had implemented for the tests
> 08:20:14 [sschaffert]: ansell: I am now using Javolution FastSet, they allow
> giving custom hash functions as parameters when creating the set
> 08:20:22 [ansell]: yes, and I have some work open extending the tests so
> that they don't expect null as the default context
> 08:20:22 [sschaffert]: and should be very fast
> 08:20:24 [wikier]: ok, wrapping up, can we consider that ready for being
> released?
> 08:21:09 [sschaffert]: (for the NOTICE and LICENSE: Javolution is BSD
> 2-clause license, I already updated the NOTICE and LICENSE files)
> 08:21:38 [wikier]: update MARMOTTA-213 so
> 08:22:15 [sschaffert]: it is not related to 213, because 213 is referring to
> the remaining *old* issues :)
> 08:22:38 [wikier]: new dependencies also affect it
> 08:22:45 [wikier]: just to have track
> 08:23:00 [wikier]: ok
> 08:23:15 [wikier]: back to the technical part of the issue
> 08:23:15 [sschaffert]: well, I inserted in the old style and once you check
> the LICENSE and NOTICE you can fix it if needed, nothing to track
> specifically
> 08:23:15 [wikier]: can we consider that ready for being released?
> 08:23:30 [sschaffert]: please do some testing first in your scenarios
> 08:23:39 [sschaffert]: not unit-testing, real testing
> 08:23:45 [wikier]: so no
> 08:24:01 [sschaffert]: no, "yes but..."
> 08:24:24 [sschaffert]: I tested, it works for me, seems reliable, but I'd
> like to see you test it as well
> 08:24:33 [wikier]: I'd recommend to open an issue for addressing such
> user-based testing before the release
> 08:24:54 [wikier]: critical one
> 08:25:00 [jfrank]: +1
> 08:25:09 [sschaffert]: I consider this part of the release preparation, and
> who would be responsible for closing it?
> 08:25:44 [sschaffert]: I don't like issues with "Responsibility: All"
> 08:26:07 [wikier]: exacly
> 08:26:07 [wikier]: date?
> 08:26:22 [sschaffert]: end of September
> 08:26:47 [jfrank]: well, release is scheduled for Thursday....
> 08:26:52 [sschaffert]: 3 days before release
> 08:26:52 [sschaffert]: ah ok
> 08:27:07 [wikier]: so
> 08:27:07 [sschaffert]: then test until Thursday but extensively :)
> 08:27:15 [wikier]: release target date would be the end of month>
> 08:27:21 [wikier]: ?
> 08:27:36 [sschaffert]: jfrank just said Thursday, which was new for me
> 08:27:39 [sschaffert]: I thought end of the month
> 08:28:14 [wikier]: as soon the better
> 08:28:51 [wikier]: what about end of next week?
> 08:28:53 [wikier]: 20th
> 08:29:30 [wikier]: as target date for the first release vote?
> 08:29:52 [wikier]: well, first we have to agree on something
> 08:30:08 [wikier]: right now we have 18 issues registered
> 08:30:09 [wikier]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:30:14 [sschaffert]: end of next week is bad, because next week we are
> working partly on other topics
> 08:30:22 [jfrank]: that's the point
> 08:30:29 [sschaffert]: either end of this week or end of the month
> 08:30:38 [wikier]: I'd prefer to focus the effort on those major/critical
> (8), and shift the others to 3.2
> 08:30:52 [wikier]: first we should agree on what
> 08:30:59 [sschaffert]: agreed
> 08:30:59 [wikier]: and then think about dates
> 08:31:24 [wikier]: specially conflicting is MARMOTTA-228, since it's
> blocking many other ui-related issues
> 08:32:10 [sschaffert]: yes, I don't know the progress on this issue, tkurz
> was working on it
> 08:32:44 [wikier]: PROPOSAL: shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77,
> MARMOTTA-110, MARMOTTA-67, MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182,
> MARMOTTA-228 and MARMOTTA-248 to version 3.2
> 08:32:44 [sschaffert]: he is in a meeting right now, we can ask him later if
> this can be finished until end of this week
> 08:32:44 [wikier]: +1
> 08:33:07 [wikier]: sschaffert: summarizing: no progress inthe topic branch
> 08:33:07 [jfrank]: anyways, 228 is not critical.
> 08:33:15 [wikier]:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-marmotta.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/MARMOTTA-228
> 08:33:31 [jfrank]: 110 is in progress and 98% done
> 08:33:44 [sschaffert]: yes, but I would not take a decision without tkurz
> 08:34:37 [jfrank]: 43 should be moved
> 08:34:39 [wikier]: I talked with him, and since the work in that branch is
> very disengaged from the develop one, he would prefer to shit it
> 08:34:52 [sschaffert]: ok, so we shift it
> 08:35:07 [wikier]: ok
> 08:35:07 [wikier]: so, again
> 08:35:14 [wikier]: PROPOSAL: shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77,
> MARMOTTA-67, MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182, MARMOTTA-228 and
> MARMOTTA-248 to version 3.2
> 08:35:17 [sschaffert]: +1
> 08:35:29 [ansell]: +1
> 08:35:29 [jfrank]: checking...
> 08:35:37 [wikier]: +1
> 08:35:54 [wikier]: current sumary at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:36:06 [ansell]: then 228 could have major priority rather than minor, to
> fit its blocking issues
> 08:36:36 [sschaffert]: good suggestion
> 08:36:36 [wikier]: ansell: I agree, but for the next release
> 08:36:45 [ansell]: yes, after the shift
> 08:36:52 [sschaffert]: yes, so when you shift the issues, update priority
> 08:36:52 [wikier]: good
> 08:36:54 [wikier]: agree
> 08:37:01 [jfrank]: +1 to the shift-list
> 08:37:07 [wikier]: ok
> 08:37:14 [wikier]: 4 +1s
> 08:37:52 [wikier]: dglachs, AndyS westei?
> 08:37:59 [dglachs]: +1
> 08:38:00 [wikier]: ok
> 08:38:07 [sschaffert]: btw, did you also check the issues without
> "fixVersion"? some might be critical as well for the release
> 08:38:10 [wikier]: #action: shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77,
> MARMOTTA-67, MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182, MARMOTTA-228 and
> MARMOTTA-248 to version 3.2
> 08:38:22 [wikier]: #action shift MARMOTTA-238, MARMOTTA-192, MARMOTTA-77,
> MARMOTTA-67, MARMOTTA-43,MARMOTTA-296, MARMOTTA-182, MARMOTTA-228 and
> MARMOTTA-248 to version 3.2
> 08:38:23 [AndyS]: I'm not a developer here.
> 08:38:52 [wikier]: ok, no
> 08:39:14 [wikier]: ok, so now we are in a much better position for planning
> the release
> 08:39:23 [wikier]: next week is a bit difficult for some of us
> 08:39:37 [wikier]: so, I think end of month would be fine
> 08:39:44 [wikier]: 26th?
> 08:39:54 [sschaffert]: either this or we aim for end of this week
> 08:40:10 [westei]: +1
> 08:40:14 [sschaffert]: end of this week would have the advantage that we'll
> do a sprint now and push things forward
> 08:40:30 [wikier]: exactly
> 08:41:24 [wikier]: and then, if the release passes, actually releasing by
> the end of month
> 08:41:24 [wikier]: sound good for me
> 08:41:31 [sschaffert]: ok
> 08:41:31 [sschaffert]: so
> 08:42:01 [sschaffert]: PROPOSAL: finish release candidate end of this week
> and release it 26th
> 08:42:09 [wikier]: +1
> 08:42:31 [sschaffert]: we can have the votes running next week then (first
> on our list then on incubator-general, so 6 days)
> 08:42:31 [sschaffert]: +1
> 08:43:33 [jfrank]: so - 9 issues remain for 3.1
> 08:43:35 [wikier]: so, this is the actual current status
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:43:41 [wikier]: thx jfrank
> 08:43:43 [wikier]: 9 issues
> 08:43:48 [wikier]: perfect
> 08:43:50 [sschaffert]: jfrank: I don't agree, I think there are some that
> are simply not marked correctly
> 08:44:19 [wikier]: as soon as they are solve, we should merge develop to
> default, so then no new features should go there
> 08:44:34 [jfrank]: which ones?
> 08:44:36 [wikier]: sschaffert: what?!?
> 08:44:57 [sschaffert]: 40 issues altogether without a fixVersion
> 08:45:00 [sschaffert]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:45:27 [jfrank]: we cleaned the list, now we can add new ones ;-)
> 08:45:51 [wikier]: those were not planned for 3.1, simple
> 08:45:58 [sschaffert]: most of these are non-critical
> 08:46:04 [ansell]: I get 90 issues without a fix version, including 53 that
> are bugs (not tasks or improvements)
> 08:46:29 [wikier]: although, some are not rightly planned
> 08:46:36 [wikier]: MARMOTTA-283 is one
> 08:46:36 [sschaffert]: ansell: of these 90 many are closed
> 08:46:44 [sschaffert]: or resolved
> 08:46:44 [ansell]: ahhh, my bad
> 08:46:59 [ansell]: so only 2 critical unclosed bugs without a fix version
> 08:47:21 [ansell]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 08:48:02 [sschaffert]: yes, 232 is hard to reproduce but I am working on it
> 08:48:18 [sschaffert]: this is actually what I was doing right now
> 08:48:26 [wikier]: msot of then should go to 3.2, or even 4.x
> 08:48:41 [wikier]: but, please, check the list
> 08:49:14 [sschaffert]: that was my point
> 08:49:43 [sschaffert]: and if an issue is not fixed, please update the
> fixVersion and priority
> 08:50:52 [jfrank]: we have 20 unscheduled bugs...
> 08:50:59 [jfrank]: but not all are real bugs.
> 08:51:14 [sschaffert]: so update the issue types if you encounter one of
> those :)
> 08:51:15 [wikier]: sschaffert: you were recently working on MARMOTTA-232,
> right?
> 08:51:22 [sschaffert]: yes
> 08:51:29 [wikier]: MARMOTTA-232
> 08:51:31 [ansell]: 205 doesn't seem like an actual bug since it was
> reverted, pending my fixes to sesame for rdf-1.1
> 08:51:37 [sschaffert]: until I ran into your MARMOTTA-300 ;-)
> 08:51:52 [wikier]: so should be planned for 3.1, right?
> 08:52:16 [jfrank]: I moved all rdf-1.1 issues to 3.2
> 08:52:37 [ansell]: 205 didn't have a version though, so it wasn't moved, as
> far as I can tell
> 08:52:44 [jfrank]: so 205 should be working now...
> 08:52:52 [ansell]: yes
> 08:53:14 [jfrank]: i'll add it (205) to 3.1
> 08:54:11 [jfrank]: what about 155?
> 08:54:11 [jfrank]: MARMOTTA-155
> 08:54:19 [wikier]: +1 about MARMOTTA-205
> 08:55:04 [sschaffert]: yes, +1 for me also
> 08:55:28 [sschaffert]: MARMOTTA-208, did anyone verify it since I fixed in
> June?
> 08:56:00 [ansell]: 155 will require a new LanguageHandler implementation,
> see https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-1826 for updates on that
> 08:56:14 [wikier]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> <-- only 6 remaining
> 08:56:44 [sschaffert]: for 155, did anyone try with Java 7 lately?
> 08:56:52 [ansell]: I had a BCP47 LanguageHandler implementation ready for
> sesame until the veto of the java-7 upgrade, so it is quite easy to do
> 08:56:52 [sschaffert]: I added a comment back in March
> 08:57:59 [wikier]: so ansell, then MARMOTTA-155 should be shift awaiting for
> sesame 2.9.x?
> 08:58:29 [ansell]: trouble is that it isn't actually necessarily going to be
> sesame-2.9
> 08:58:52 [ansell]: threeroundstones have vetoed the java-7 update
> indefinitely
> 08:59:24 [sschaffert]: ui, why? Java 6 is already out of support
> 08:59:24 [ansell]: the way LanguageHandler is setup though, is that anyone
> can implement one, so we can do it independently for marmotta
> 08:59:32 [wikier]: ok, so I'll test MARMOTTA-155 with java7
> 08:59:39 [ansell]: no idea, I was annoyed at it also, given the effort I put
> into it
> 09:00:09 [wikier]: ok, I take it
> 09:00:24 [ansell]:
> https://bitbucket.org/openrdf/sesame/src/7796198d63fb3b43fb21c6c79eba06701e9914a2/core/rio/languages/src/main/java/org/openrdf/rio/languages/RFC3066LanguageHandler.java?at=master
> 09:00:31 [ansell]: just need to reimplement that class
> 09:00:41 [sschaffert]: ok, great
> 09:00:49 [ansell]: and then add it to each ParserConfig object (that last
> bit is the big bit)
The freenode IRC network had a netsplit around this point, where
jfrank and I seemed to be on a different node to the rest of the group
for a few minutes. (Not being familiar with IRC), I didn't realise
what had happened until the meeting was over and I was sent the
following notifications:
jfrank left the room (quit: Quit: Leaving). 7:09
sschaffert left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
wikier left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
westei left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
Humbedooh left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
ASFBot left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
AndyS left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
dglachs left the room (quit: *.net *.split). 7:18
Thanks,
Peter
> 09:01:54 [wikier]: ok, great guys! empty list at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 09:02:14 [wikier]: so now we have 17 for 3.1-incubating:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MARMOTTA%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1-incubating%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> 09:02:51 [wikier]: I think we can afford it by the planned date
> 09:02:53 [wikier]: what do you think?
> 09:02:58 [AndyS]: Java6 is not out of support everywhere but the real issue
> seems to be that too many people+orgs are still using it. /me does not
> really understand why they aren't using Java7 (with Java6 code) just for the
> bug fixes and performance improvements).
> 09:02:58 [sschaffert]: ok, I also think so
> 09:04:04 [wikier]: sounds feasible
> 09:04:18 [wikier]: great! at least we have a plan
> 09:06:52 [wikier]: #info 17 issues shopuld be fixed for 3.1-incubating:
> MARMOTTA-284, MARMOTTA-213, MARMOTTA-300, MARMOTTA-301, MARMOTTA-232,
> MARMOTTA-28, MARMOTTA-149 MARMOTTA-236 MARMOTTA-225 MARMOTTA-283,
> MARMOTTA-208, MARMOTTA-199, MARMOTTA-205, MARMOTTA-155 , MARMOTTA-231,
> MARMOTTA-110 and MARMOTTA-280
> 09:07:02 [wikier]: s/shopuld/should
> 09:07:25 [wikier]: actually 18
> 09:07:50 [wikier]: #info 18 issues shopuld be fixed for 3.1-incubating:
> MARMOTTA-284, MARMOTTA-213, MARMOTTA-300, MARMOTTA-301, MARMOTTA-232,
> MARMOTTA-28, MARMOTTA-149 MARMOTTA-236 MARMOTTA-225, MARMOTTA-283,
> MARMOTTA-208, MARMOTTA-199, MARMOTTA-205, MARMOTTA-155 , MARMOTTA-231,
> MARMOTTA-110, MARMOTTA-280 and MARMOTTA-215
> 09:08:18 [wikier]: no new features in the develop branch, please
> 09:08:23 [sschaffert]: ok, so we do it like this? internal release candidate
> until Thursday, release candidate preparation on Friday, vote mail to
> dev@marmotta... on Friday evening
> 09:08:38 [wikier]: even if we think "it is quite easy" ;-)
> 09:08:46 [wikier]: sschaffert: sounds good
> 09:09:01 [wikier]: +1
> 09:09:10 [sschaffert]: actually I have no ideas for new features at the
> moment anyways, and since I am the worst person in this ... ;-)
> 09:09:18 [wikier]: xDDD
> 09:10:00 [sschaffert]: so any other business?
> 09:10:32 [wikier]: #note: release planning: internal release candidate until
> Thursday 25th, release candidate preparation on Friday 26th, vote mail to
> dev@marmotta... on Friday evening
> 09:10:32 [wikier]: great
>
>
> # 3. AOB #
> 09:11:13 [AndyS]: AOB: The next report is October. It would be good to have
> graduation in that.
> 09:11:13 [wikier]: so, after this release, we should seriously think about
> the graduation
> 09:11:21 [wikier]: exactly
> 09:11:28 [wikier]: I think we all agree on that
> 09:11:37 [wikier]: I think we are ready
> 09:16:28 [sschaffert]: yes
> 09:16:28 [sschaffert]: +1
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: AndyS is right, we have to move forward
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: after incubating, we may need to be more agile planning
> versions
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: so planning features
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: and so on
> 09:16:35 [sschaffert]: then the time plan is also good with a release until
> 26th, then a report and the vote for graduation
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: until now we are trying to put as much as possible for
> the current version
> 09:16:35 [wikier]: so the release timing is affected
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: exactly
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: this is something we have to handle better
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: more incremental versions
> 09:16:52 [sschaffert]: ok, anything else?
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: but, I think, in the laste 9 months, the code base has
> been established a lot
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: no, from my side we can close the meeting
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: aob guys?
> 09:16:52 [sschaffert]: no
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: no from my side
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: ok
> 09:16:52 [wikier]: great
> 09:17:05 [wikier]: thx guys!
> 09:17:05 [sschaffert]: thanks!
> 09:17:05 [sschaffert]: and good look with the bugs :)
> 09:17:05 [wikier]: for all comments and help
> 09:17:15 [wikier]: hope to be able to follow the plan we have outlined :-)
> 09:17:15 [wikier]: let's continue in the mailing list
> 09:17:15 [wikier]: ASFBot: meeting end
>
>
