Guys if you prefer we could organize a call to discuss these more complex points. Maybe could be more productive.
Em dom., 23 de ago. de 2020 às 22:39, Daniel Takabayashi < daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi Lucas, > > I am a little confused about your e-mail, I couldn't get your point. > Could you please be a little more specific? > > Thanks, > Taka > > Em sáb., 15 de ago. de 2020 às 14:32, Lucas Cardoso Silva < > cardosolucas61....@gmail.com> escreveu: > >> Hi guys, >> >> To continue our goal to evaluate the architecture, we have to present the >> proposal for all involved. I will take the opportunity to discuss some >> points about the implementation of the daemon and new CLI. >> >> Each engine has a Dockerfile for development where all dependencies >> related >> to the operating system will be declared. When the CLI is invoked for the >> engine, the image is created and the container starts, with the daemon as >> the main execution. All modifications to the engine are saved directly to >> the files (via bind mount). All commands, except the creational and >> versioning commands, run on the daemon (called by the CLI). Do you agree >> with this approach? It’s a little different from that represented in the >> image, which represents the use of a volume. >> >> Architectural proposal image: >> >> https://github.com/lucasbm88/incubator-apache-marvin/wiki/Development-Resources#v005---refactoring-architecture >> >> Image of the current architecture: >> >> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1UOR8Bk0fpLAOnotdeAn4Ww1GBbRxhdtM5mfoTJKQNVo/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Thanks a lot, >> Lucas >> >
