On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 09:40, Ben Walding wrote:
> Aren't we deprecating the default ant namespace?

Yes, I definitely want to do that. Added to the list!

> And sort of in the spirit of deprecation, should start warning about 
> bogus poms eg. auto run pom:validate and maybe pom:contentvalidate on 
> every run if they are quick enough.

I would like to but it looks like we can't use what we had because
xsdlib can't be on ibiblio. So we can fall back to the simple xerces
validation I guess. That is a drag.

> 
> 
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just wanted to start gathering a list of possible deprecations for
> >beta-9.
> >
> >The only thing I would like to start deprecating is the use of the <id/>
> >element in dependencies which will remove the need for the fugly
> >notation.
> >
> >So we will always have:
> >
> ><groupId/>
> ><artifactId/>
> >
> >explicitly set for dependencies.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to