The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: Brian Ewins
    Created: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 4:46 AM
       Body:
(reply to Vincent) yes, I'm sure this is a bug, in most cases. If you look at how 
${pom.dependencies} is used, typically it is in a loop where the plugin attempts to 
copy the dependency with a filename like so:

${maven.repo.local}/{$dep.artifactDirectory}/jars/${dep.artifact}

This is a typical example. It makes the assumption that the dependency is a jar (an 
obvious bug); it also assumes it knows the structure of the local repository (which it 
doesn't - thats set up in Artifact.generatePath currently). Finally, it is wrong 
because of the jar override mechanism. The jar override explicitly sets a path to an 
artifact, and is unrelated to the path that you'd get by looking at the dependency 
(this is done in ArtifactListBuilder, so there is no trace in pom.dependencies that it 
has been done - but the artifacts in pom.artifacts are changed). 

As Michal commented in the thread about this, it would be best if we could get 
something which allowed this usage:

${localartifact.file}

However, since artifacts have no knowledge of where maven.repo.local is, you still 
need to do:

${maven.repo.local}/${artifact.path}

- unless someone makes a change to the core. Since we still have the local repo 
mentioned, we've not got away from the jar override problem, but it does clear up the 
other issues.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-518


Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MAVEN-518
    Summary: plugins guess filename from  'dependency', should use 'artifact'
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

 Time Spent: Unknown
   Estimate: 0 minutes

    Project: maven

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Brian Ewins

    Created: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 9:49 AM
    Updated: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 4:52 PM

Description:
Quite a few plugins are mistakenly referring to and looping over dependencies when 
they mean to use artifacts. For example this code in the war plugin:

<j:forEach var="dep" items="${pom.dependencies}">
  <j:if test="${dep.getProperty('war.bundle.jar')=='true'}">
    <lib dir="${maven.repo.local}/${dep.artifactDirectory}/jars/">
      <include name="${dep.artifact}"/>
    </lib>
  </j:if>
</j:forEach>

Will not work if the 'jar' element has been used to override the filename of a 
dependency. In maven Artifacts know their filename, Dependencies don't. You can 
navigate from an Artifact to a Dependency if required, so that one fix might look like:

<j:forEach var="lib" items="${pom.artifacts}">
  <j:set var="dep" value="${lib.dependency}"/>
  <j:if test="${dep.getProperty('war.bundle.jar')=='true'}">
    <lib dir="${maven.repo.local}">
      <include name="${lib.path}"/>
    </lib>
  </j:if>
</j:forEach> 

While this removes all knowledge of the internal structure of the local repo from the 
plugin, it is still not ideal. If a project is allowed to depend on jars that are 
outside the local repository via the jar override mechanism then plugins should not 
use 'maven.repo.local' either.

To find these issues in the plugins, go to the plugins-build directory and do:
$ find . -name '*.jelly' | xargs grep pom.dependencies 
(NB the gump and release plugins are listed by this but are not affected)
also do:
$ find . -name '*.jelly' | xargs grep maven.repo.local 
the second set will pick out most of the first set of problems, but will also find the 
occasional case where an individual dependency is misused.

The following files are known to be affected by this bug:
./ant/plugin.jelly
./deploy/plugin.jelly
./ear/plugin.jelly
./ejb/plugin.jelly
./idea/plugin.jelly
./jboss/plugin.jelly
./jdeveloper/plugin.jelly
./jnlp/plugin.jelly
./uberjar/plugin.jelly
./war/plugin.jelly

(Patch to follow)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to