The following issue has been updated:

    Updater: dion gillard (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
       Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:23 AM
    Changes:
             timeoriginalestimate changed from 0
             timeestimate changed from 0 minutes
             Fix Version changed to 1.1
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full history of the issue, see:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-158&page=history

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-158


Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: MAVEN-158
    Summary: Busted taskdefs in maven.xml
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: maven
 Components: 
             core
   Fix Fors:
             1.1
   Versions:
             1.0-beta-8

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: James CE Johnsom

    Created: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:17 AM
    Updated: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:23 AM
Environment: Linux, jsdk 1.4.0-01

Description:
The specific problem is with trying to define a junit taskdef in maven.xml. The 
classloader doesn't get the junit jar into the classpath because we haven't invoked 
anything in the test plugin which "owns" that jarfile (even though project.xml requsts 
junit*jar to be in the root classloader).

To quote from a conversation between myself and Bob:
(10:29:51) bob: so, to boil it down...
(10:30:08) bob: a taskdef in maven.xml can't get its own jar loaded into [root] like 
the plugins do.
(10:30:32) jcej: Even though project.xml specifies the jar *and* does the <properties> 
thing to stuff it into [root]
(10:30:34) bob: a project's project.xml should be inspected, just like plugins' 
project.xml, to find extra jars to put in the forehead loader.
(10:30:41) jcej: Exactly.
(10:30:47) bob: so, the bug is we ignore the project's <properties> stuff.
(10:30:53) jcej: Apparently.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to