The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ben Walding
Created: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:00 PM
Body:
Do we really want to encourage unversioned jars?
The jar has a version, just that some clown from XXX didn't put it in the name.
I personally think we should go the other way and make <version> a mandatory element
of dependency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-654
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MAVEN-654
Summary: No version causes bad jar name
Type: Improvement
Status: Unassigned
Priority: Trivial
Time Spent: Unknown
Remaining: Unknown
Project: maven
Components:
core
Fix Fors:
1.1
Versions:
1.0-beta-10
Assignee:
Reporter: dion gillard
Created: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:01 PM
Updated: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:01 PM
Description:
Just something that occurred to me the other day. If I have:
<dependency>
<id>javamail</id>
</dependency>
It really should be smart and look for javamail.jar and not javamail-.jar.
There's enough in the way of non-versioned jars [especially from sun] that
this would be a nice pain reducer.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
