I'm confused.

My understanding is:
- So RC1_STABLE is the branch people should be using if they want to build
and use latest maven and do bits and pieces development
- HEAD will be full of upheaval like renaming all of the properties in
plugins and likely be unstable until RC1
- for RC1, all fixes on the branch will be merged down to HEAD

Not that it matters to me as I'm not a committer :) I'm just wondering where
to dev my patches. Seems like branch is the place to be.

Is it possible a rough wiki page could be put up to explain this and linked
from the CVS instructions on the site? I can do that if what I've said is
right. Also, I'd like to get a rough list of stuff that should be avoided on
the branch as it is changing on HEAD. From what I understand that would be
things like:
- don't use '.' in plugin property names for new properties. Follow the
convention of [a-z][A-Z_0-9]+ (eg someVariable)
- cross plugin property fetching will change - keep it to a minimum (ie if
you need it - do one <j:set/> to get the var into the context, then use that
one
- avoid using the <classloader/> property on a dependency.

Are these correct? Anything else to add?

Cheers,
Brett

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 3:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MAVEN_RC1_STABLE branch
> 
> 
> As you may have noticed, the MAVEN_RC1_STABLE branch is now open for 
> business.
> 
> I've backported the fixes post the RC1 refactor tag, so it 
> should all be 
> up to date.
> 
> The goal is to keep this a functioning set of code and apply 
> fixes to it 
> until the refactor is ready to be dropped in. As such, all 
> non-core work 
> should happen in this branch.
> 
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> 

Reply via email to