Sorry for bumping in, but I'm exactly midway between user and developer, the kind that uses HEAD.
I was using HEAD until not-so-long ago, mostly for Cactus plugin reasons. And I luckily obtained a version that is satisfactory for me right before the HEAD/STABLE split, then I stopped building regularly, but that was just due to lack of time. I myself would love to have back an ongoing HEAD as good as it was 'til July. And this is a praise, not a critic, please understand me. Florin ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:17 AM Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs changes.xml > > > > However, we're not making it nice for all those other people working > > from CVS HEAD. I have been working a Maven user for the past 2 years and > > I can tell you the 2 projects that I have used it on are using CVS HEAD > > version (there's no other solution as the stable release are always > > missing something and the plugins have not been decorelated from the > > core). > I'd love to know how many people are actually working from CVS head at > this point. Last week, my guess would be that it was just me and noone > else had even bootstrapped with the refactored code, there were so many > problems. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
