Rafal Krzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/08/2003 10:14:27 PM: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After a discussion on IRC with Jason this afternoon I've volunteered to > > roll back CVS Head so it has the pre-refactor code + the changes since, > > until Jason can spend some more time on getting the refactor working with > > all the plugins. > > > > Does anyone have a problem with rolling back the refactor? > > This is really bad news. Porting changes back and forth between the > branches is a always a waste of effort. The time needed to do that > could be spent better on fixing the problems in HEAD. Yep, and as the person doing this both times, and also the person trying to fix things in HEAD, I realise this.
> If there is pressure however to have beta 11 released without the > memory leak plugged up, a MAVEN_BETA_11 branch could be sprouted > at the point of pre refactoring tag, and as many bug fixes as possible > would be ported there. Nope, no beta 11. I'm hoping to get 1.0 released. That includes the memory leak and everything else that's in Jira. But for two weeks we've had a HEAD that doesn't function and still needs lots of work, which Jason hasn't had the time to help fix. I'd like to keep pushing on to a release, but don't have the time to work on fixing HEAD as well. I'd rather we all push on using a stable HEAD and integrate the changes once Jason has either thoroughly tested them or can integrate them incrementally. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
