Ben Walding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/09/2003 07:31:00 AM: > I missed discussion of the previous version unfortunately. And it isn't
> listed on the main page at the maven-plugins.sf.net site - only in CVS. > > > Usually the major sticking point for our use of LGPL is if we have to > import code (i.e. import com.* statements). Since neither of the > findbugs plugins do this, I'd wager that it being lgpl isn't an issue. > If it is, then we're going to have to take yet another look at plugins - > checkstyle is LGPL and it is an included plugin. Yep. Let's be consistent then. > Once external plugin handling is simplified, it won't be an issue, but > for now - core plugins have far more exposure than anything else. What else needs to be done for 'external plugin handling'? > I agree there should only be 1 findbugs plugin. I don't really care > which one dies / is folded into the other. +1 from me. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
