Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/09/2003 08:25:30 PM:

> To be honest, I don't really care how the next release is named, as soon
> as it comes in a few weeks ;-)

I hear ya.

> IMHO the essential questions are:
> 
> 1) which will be the first rel with the memory leak be fixed ?

There's more than one memory leak :-)

> 2) which will be the first rel with all plugins decoupled ?

I don't even think this is on a roadmap.

> If the answer is "1.0 (final)" for both questions then IMHO a 1.0-RC1 
> needs to have these features.

Bah,
a fixed memory leak isn't a feature. an RC could have the leak and the 1.0 
fix it, it's just a bug.

> On the other hand, when will 1+2 be available?

When someone gets the time and energy to finish them.

AFAIK, 2) can be achieved today. I'd prefer NOT to decouple *all* the 
plugins. Seems like a damn silly idea.

> Probably users will be happy with a in-between-beta11 release which does
> not have 1) and 2).
> 
> release early, release often :-)

The only core change I can think of that warrants a new beta is that there 
were classes moved from beta10 to now which means rc1 plugins don't work 
in b10.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to