"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/09/2003 06:21:35 PM:
> You don't get me. I'm not saying we will not upload different versions > of the website. I'm just saying that we should store the history of the > xdoc in CVS. I'm ok on this. > > > - A website is a production (a.k.a artifact) of a project and as > such it > > > should go in the local/remote repository. Maybe under a new "webs" > or > > > "websites" type? > > > > This is a great idea, but doesn't the 'dist' goal already include the > > site? If not, why not? > > Then let's use this. I just did a 'dist' for a plugin - no docs :-( > What I am saying is very easy. Let's imagine I've finished version 3.0 > of the Cactus plugin. I upload the web site in: > > /x1/www/maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/cactus/v3.0 > > Then we also have a special directory: > > /x1/www/maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/cactus/snapshot > > And a symbolic link in /x1/www/maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/cactus > that points to > /x1/www/maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/cactus/v3.0/index.html I'm not real big on symbolic links, as they're hard to do with fs:deploy. Maybe a page with a meta refresh tag? > My belief is that the latest released version should be the default doc. Me too. > The snapshot version should be accessed through a menu. +1. > In order to ease this process, I am suggesting modifying the existing > site:deploy plugin. > > What do you think? +1. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
