Haven't really had cause to look at this yet. Personally, I dropped the "maven-" altogether for our organisation, but adding some prefix is a good idea as there is no concept of groupId in the plugins directory.
In the future we definitely need to take the whole id into account - this was discussed on the dev list not too long ago. - Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Coast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 2 October 2003 11:34 AM > To: maven dev > Subject: plugin naming > > > just wondering, > > the convention for plugin naming is > > maven-[myplugin]-plugin > > is the 'maven' bit supposed to indicate that it's a maven > plugin or a plugin > produced by maven? > > in other words is the convention > > [organisation]-[myplugin]-plugin > > thanks > Nathan > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
