This fix came with switching from projectBeanReader to getProject, but a consequence was that the expressions were evaluated in the wrong order so I took it back out.
I'm pretty confident I can add it back in as I clean this stuff up - sorry I haven't had a chance to look at it again this week. The only failures at the moment are in the touchstone tests. I think this tag should probably not be used as the other workaround does this. Cheers, Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2003 5:48 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven > RootRelativePathTag.java MavenTagLibrary.java > > > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 19:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > vmassol 2003/10/08 16:44:04 > > > > Modified: src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven > > MavenTagLibrary.java > > Added: src/test/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven > > RootRelativePathTagTest.java > > src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven > > RootRelativePathTag.java > > Log: > > Added new tag which can be used to implement property inheritance > > while waiting for the final fix in maven 2.0... > > I'm not sure how much code Brett has integrated but I believe > he integrated code that will take care of this. I certainly > wasn't planning on waiting until 2.0 to fix this, just post > 1.0. If he's got it working then I would certainly like to > use that and not encourage what you just suggested. > > Brett how you making out on integrating that code? > > > -- > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and > > technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
