> Assuming a 1 to 1 relationship with groupId and artifactId would > be harmful for many projects. (including mine. ;-) >
I didn't mean that artifactId=groupId :) I meant that the same artifactId and groupId are shared between two or more artifacts. Just their types are different. For example: (groupId:artifactId:type) foo:baa:jar foo:baa:pom foo:baa:javadoc Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
