Is POM v4 a 1.0, 1.1, or 2.x change? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/11/2003 08:05:30 AM: > On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 15:57, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to make <groupId> a mandatory element in POM version 4. What do > > you think? The reason is that I don't what the default can be if it's > > not specified and if we want to have plugins that start using the > > id/groupId/type elements, there must be a groupId defined. > > > > Here's my +1 > > +1 > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
