I much prefer 'Lead Developer' to 'Owner'. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/11/2003 02:22:10 PM: > I agree. Is there any precedent? "Owner" as the role do? Or is it Release > Manager, Lead, ...? > > - Brett > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2003 2:18 PM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven > > plugins + ot her stuff > > > > > > Why don't we just put the 'owner' as the <role> of a <developer> in > > project.xml? > > > > This means we don't need to keep the wiki up to date separate > > from the > > project too, and it comes out as part of the site generation. > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/11/2003 > > 08:24:55 AM: > > > > > > Who wants to take ownership for the other plugins? We should > > > > probably update the wiki page listing these ownerships. > > > > > > > > > > I'll take idea, scm and cruisecontrol for now. > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
