[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:41 PM: > "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/11/2003 08:05:18 > PM: > >> I guess it all depends on the question of whether we wish to link POM >> versions to Maven releases. I think, I'm being swayed and I agree >> it's cleaner to link them.... >> >> <thinking some more> >> >> Ok, I think I've realized what the problem is: We are developing >> 1.0-RC1 on HEAD. This is the main problem. Normally here's how I >> would expect development to work: >> >> - HEAD always contains latest development for the *next* release >> (that would be 1.1-SNAPSHOT for us) > > The next release for us is 1.0, not 1.1-SNAPSHOT. We haven't had a 1.0 > yet.
Well, but 1.0 is currently freezed. So development of new features is not possible without a branch. You can therefore branch for features or for the upcoming release. Normally it is easier to handle the branch for the upcoming release (supposed to have bug fixed only). Just my 2c J�rg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
