Some ideas... :-) Why not 2 web sites:
- maven.apache.org pointing to HEAD - maven.apache.org/1.0/ pointing to MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH I prefer this way. On the Cactus project I tried the opposite (i.e. default pointing to latest release) and it didn't work that well. After a few weeks we swapped to HEAD for the main site and the release versions in other directories (http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.5/ etc). Another variation (but slower) is: - maven.apache.org redirects to maven.apache.org/1.1/ pointing to HEAD - maven.apache.org/1.0/ pointing to MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH The plugins would stay in the same place. However we can apply the same principle to them: maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/[plugin name]/[version]/ The project.xml would need to be modified to: <siteDirectory>/www/maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/ear/${pom.current Version}</siteDirectory> Then the navigation.xml can be modified to add: <menu name="Docs for"> <item name="version 1.0" href="../1.0"/> <item name="version 1.1" href="../1.1"/> </menu> -Vincent > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 November 2003 23:14 > To: Maven Developers List ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Subject: site generation > > Just a thought... should the main site now be generated from > MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH or HEAD? > > I'm +1 for the branch as it is the next release and all changes made there > will go to HEAD eventually. > > I think we need to resurrect that plan for general site publishing rules > from earlier in the year and flesh it out some more. I still have the > notes > sitting on my desk... :) > > Cheers, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > Team Leader, Core Systems > f2 network ~ everything essential > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
