> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2004 00:51
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/pluginJellyPlugin.java
> 
> "Stephane Nicoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/01/2004
05:48:18
> AM:
> 
> > I agree with you.
> > However, what about cvs history?
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoy� : samedi 3 janvier 2004 18:52
> > � : Maven Developers List
> > Objet : Re: cvs commit:
> > maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/pluginJellyPlugin.java
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 01:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > dion        2004/01/02 22:45:40
> > >
> > >   Modified:    src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven Tag:
> > >                         MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH ParamCheck.java
> UserCheck.java
> > >                         CopyResources.java PluginVarTag.java
> > >                src/java/org/apache/maven/util Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         DVSLFormatter.java
> > >                src/test/java/org/apache/maven Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         JAXPTest.java
> > >                src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin Tag:
> MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         PluginManagerTest.java
> > >                src/java/org/apache/maven/cli Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > App.java
> > >                src/java/org/apache/maven/project Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         Project.java
> > >                src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         MavenException.java
> > >                src/java/org/apache/maven/plugin Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > >                         JellyPlugin.java
> > >   Log:
> > >   Remove my @authors
> > >
> >
> > Why are you doing that? It makes it really hard to easily see who
has
> > done what which I personally find very valuable. I would actually
ask
> > that you put them back as I find it extremely annoying having
anonymous
> > sources as it doesn't promote any sort of code quality,
accountability
> > and leaves new comers resorting to scm commands to figure out who
did
> > what in the event they would actually like to ask any questions.
> 
> Lots of reasons. One being the sheer amount of spam I get from web
> collected email addresses.

Why don't you use the "at" strategy? As in: "dion at multitask dot com"
for example?

WRT spam I have found that the best solution is to have a good anti-spam
tool. It works really great. I'm using Spambayes and it catches 100% of
my spam emails and almost no false positives (about 1 false positive put
in the "unsure spam" folder every 7 days - I get about 150 spam emails
per day, so it's not too bad at all).

-Vincent

> 
> As far as author tags promoting code quality and accountability, that
> doesn't happen for me in practice, and getting a history of a
particular
> file is a piece of cake for anyone that uses an IDE, or knows CVS.
> 
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to