On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 07:43, Ben Walding wrote: > I don't necessarily agree that getters and setters should be tested > explicitly.
As far as code and development go in general I don't think there is ever a downside in being explicit. Who knows how the code will evolve and who knows what will change and given that it's very simple to test them I see no harm in the additions of simple tests for properties. > If you are exercising your beans properly, the getters and > setters should be getting hit by other methods. If they are not getting > hit, and you have good coverage across the board, then that tends to > indicate that you might not need those attributes any more. > > > Just another perspective... > > > Ben > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
