I believe he's talking about what's mentioned here (see the asterix): http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope
/Anders On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com>wrote: > I don't understand the difference between what you suggest here, Mark, and > simply disabling transitive dependencies. > Could you elaborate somewhat? > > > 2014-04-07 3:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com>: > > > On 7 Apr 2014, at 12:32, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > We then have other logical classpaths. . Something like javadoc should > >> be able to define another named classpath structure; combining the > >> dependencies of the plugin's implementation with dynamic code > >> (doclets, whatever) seems like a category confusion to me. > >> > > > > If we change/break this - can we PLEASE make the compilation path IGNORE > > transitive dependencies of 'compile' dependencies - if I -need- it to > > compile, -I- should depend on it up front. > > > > > > Mark > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > > -- > +==============================+ > | Bästa hälsningar, > | [sw. "Best regards"] > | > | Lennart Jörelid > | EAI Architect & Integrator > | > | jGuru Europe AB > | Mölnlycke - Kista > | > | Email: l...@jguru.se > | URL: www.jguru.se > | Phone > | (skype): jgurueurope > | (intl): +46 708 507 603 > | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 > +==============================+ >
