Yes, I am aware of moving versions out into variables when they need to be
referenced multiple times. I just don't think the repetition is needed; the
artifact is basically chosen by the global dependency management; the
version really becomes irrelevant in my profile usage.

Would this be suitable Maven enhancement?


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Alexander Kriegisch <
[email protected]> wrote:

> You can use a property in your root POM and refer to it in all your
> dependencyManagement sections. While this is not perfect, it works. I am
> enclosing depMgmt sections in profiles whenever I need to override scope
> for a certain dependency. It is not quite what I want, but does the trick.
>
> --
> Alexander Kriegisch
>
>
> > Am 14.04.2014 um 19:03 schrieb Paul Benedict <[email protected]>:
> >
> > I have a need that (I don't think) Maven supports. But I would like to
> hear
> > from the Maven developers on the feature.
> >
> > My application targets different appservers. I have all my dependencies
> > specified under <dependencyManagement>, but I use different profiles
> > (appserver specific) to change which dependencies are provided by the
> > container. I really don't like the requirement that I must respecify the
> > version whose scope I am changing -- especially since the artifact is
> > already being globally managed.
> >
> > I wish I could just either (1) omit the version and have it be inherited
> > from my global dependency management or (2) use a wildcard saying I don't
> > care what version you find.
> >
> > <profile>
> >  <id>jboss</id>
> >  <dependencyManagement>
> >    <dependency>
> >      <groupId>commons-logging</groupId>
> >      <artifactId>commons-logging</groupId>
> >      <scope>provided</scope>
> >    </dependency>
> >  </dependencyManagement>
> > </profile>
> >
> > I pref #1 but #2 should just be as safe since it's impossible (?) to have
> > duplicate group:artifact:type dependencies. The biggest hack of all, I
> > suppose, is to use some sort of range from [1.0,) but that's actually
> quite
> > an abuse just to get what I want.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Paul

Reply via email to