Wouldn't be the solution to just remove the svn trunk & branches, and only leave the tags in the last revision?
Or intermediately, leave the trunk path to be found, but remove anything but that file "MOVED_TO_GIT"? 2014-04-16 22:31 GMT+02:00 Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]>: > > +1 for Git and please include the new repository location in the > MOVED_TO_GIT file as suggested by Dennis :-) > Regards Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi > > > > No objections from me, but a request. > > > > Please put a file in the root of the old svn repo called MOVED_TO_GIT or > > something similar, so that it is clear that it has moved. I wasted some > > time the other week trying to commit to plugin-testing before I realized > > that the svn repo was read-only... > > > > -- > > Dennis Lundberg > > Den 15 apr 2014 08:40 skrev "Olivier Lamy" <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Someone with a strong opposition to move maven-indexer code to git? > >> If no one complains within 72H, I will ask migration to infra. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -- > >> Olivier Lamy > >> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
