Am 2014-10-11 um 21:28 schrieb Robert Munteanu:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote:
Well said...
I guess it is all about the order of the words: Maven X Plugin. It simply
implies that is provided by the Maven team. Which is not.
But is the order relevant in the artifactId or in the public display
name? I think it's simpler to convince plugin maintainers to change
the public display name ( Maven X Plugin -> X Plugin for Maven )
rather than the artifactId.
I do not hang on the specific order, a correct display name should
suffices but Stephen was pretty obvious about trademark violation.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
