> no outstanding change in 3.2.x that blocks 3.1.x users from upgrading to 3.2.x, isn't it?
Didn't double checked, but IIRC 3.1.1 still uses JDK5. 3.2.x uses JDK 6. That may be a change you want to have in mind, though I personally don't care about JDK 5. +1 indeed. Cheers Le mer. 29 oct. 2014 03:24, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> a écrit : we currently propose 3 versions: 3.0.5, 3.1.1 and 3.2.3 which suppose we may release 3.0.6, 3.1.2 and 3.2.4 in the future I see why we would release 3.0.6: Aether change force some users to stay to 3.0.x, and I started to define some backports I'd like to put in it [1] But I don't see why we would release 3.1.2: AFAIK, there is no outstanding change in 3.2.x that blocks 3.1.x users from upgrading to 3.2.x, isn't it? Then IMHO, we should remove 3.1.1 from top download links, and only propose 3.0.5 and 3.2.3 This wouldn't only make our roadmap easier to understand Any objection? Hervé [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=20703 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
