Le vendredi 2 janvier 2015 10:31:52 Baptiste Mathus a écrit :
> Well, I for one find the x.y.z-nn somehow unusual. I'd prefer something
> simple like x.y.z and I don't give a f*ck if some numbers are skipped.
> 
> +1 with Stephen: I've never seen someone complain about missing versions
> neither on ML nor IRL. Sure, I suppose people might wonder where the 4.x
> went if the next mvn version was to be 5.0, but apart (and even though)
> from the major version, I don't see any developer ever complaining about
> that.
> 
> Just then let's indeed have a changelog somewhere just for reference that
> confirms that the x.y.foo was skipped and never released.
see http://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html
the fact that a version was never released is not explictely written, but 
since this is the official history...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to