> Ouch that's an old one :-)
>
> Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
> motivation/time to close 431


Yes, I hardly even remember this one. The code seems to be fixed except the
unit test. I'd say we should go for the easiest way so that we could close
this ticket. Then we could create a new one for any remaining work.

/Anders


>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>
> wrote:
>
> > I didn't work on this one for a long time
> >
> > Anders and Arnaud seem to have problems to decide how to fix and close
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-431
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le mardi 3 février 2015 21:50:00 Benson Margulies a écrit :
> > > So, I've committed changes to the archetype system that I believe
> > > correspond to the 2.2.1 level. What else wants to happen before a
> > > release?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>
> > wrote:
> > > > Le lundi 2 février 2015 12:42:02 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in
> > > >> Brussels i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here:
> > > >>
> > > >> Make a final release of all plugins with minium Maven 2.2.1
> > > >> (prerequisites) and Java 1.5
> > > >>
> > > >> The current state of this approach can be watched on the dist-tool
> [2]
> > > >
> > > > page.
> > > >
> > > >> After that we can start making releases of the plugins which have
> > > >> minimum Maven 3.0 and JDK 6 (I think this will bring many cleanups
> in
> > > >> code etc.)
> > > >>
> > > >> To make this more clear for the users the plugin versions should be
> > > >> bumped to 3.0....independant from their current version.
> > > >>
> > > >> This approach gives us the possibility to make in case of real bugs
> > bug
> > > >> fix releases of the older plugins for JDK 5 etc. without confusion
> JDK
> > > >> 5/JDK6 etc.
> > > >>
> > > >> These are the steps to leave Maven 2 completely behind..Yeah ;-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Currently we have two (three) exceptions maven-site-plugin (some
> kind
> > of
> > > >> special case), maven-scm-publish-plugin and maven-shade-plugin which
> > > >> already have the Maven 3 requirement.
> > > >
> > > > more precisely, IMHO, we'll need to document 2 exceptions:
> > > > 1. plugins that are already at version 3.x but do not require Maven
> 3:
> > > > maven- site-plugin, maven-plugin-plugin, maven-pmd-plugin,
> > > > maven-compiler-plugin 2. plugins that require Maven 3 with version <
> > 3.0:
> > > > maven-scm-publish-plugin and maven-shade-plugin
> > > >
> > > > And we'll need to add a documentation in every plugin that changes
> its
> > > > requirements to remember to end-users which is the last version that
> > > > requires Maven 2
> > > > Perhaps something to add to maven-docck-plugin
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Hervé
> > > >
> > > >> [1]
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40maven.apache.org/msg102539.html
> > > >> [2]
> > > >>
> >
> https://builds.apache.org/job/dist-tool-plugin/site/dist-tool-prerequisit
> > > >> es. html
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards
> > > >> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -----
> Arnaud Héritier
> http://aheritier.net
> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>

Reply via email to