Ok, no worries, as I said already, them version numbers are cheap (being and infinite supply of them and all that)
On 27 October 2015 at 14:32, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: > Appears to be 3.3.7-SNAPHOT on master so I burned another one. > >> On Oct 27, 2015, at 7:28 AM, Stephen Connolly >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I thought the last failed spin was 3.3.5 so we should be spinning >> 3.3.6... but hey I don't mind, version numbers are cheap >> >> On 27 October 2015 at 14:09, Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This was announced 7 days ago on this list >>> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201510.mbox/%3CFFA7C22B-DD49-40C7-8D78-2C6D02B87D97%40takari.io%3E >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Igor >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 09:54 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: >>>>> I’m going to start cutting the 3.3.7 now. >>>> >>>> Jason, >>>> >>>> could you announce this at least five days in advance? That would give at >>>> least some timeframe to merge PRs and handle issues. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Takari and Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > http://twitter.com/takari_io > --------------------------------------------------------- > > People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. > Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without > actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one > is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by > looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples > you look at, the more general your framework will be. > > -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
