Am 07/06/16 um 22:21 schrieb Ralph Goers: > This is an interesting situation. The classes that use Jackson are all > considered optional in Log4j, so having optional set to true is indeed what > is desired. However, we require those dependencies to compile and to run the > unit tests. With scope set to test I would expect that the non-test classes > that need them would fail to compile. So it sounds like we have to make sure > all transitive dependencies needed for testing are also specified with > optional set to true? > > Ralph
Not sure I understand the situation correctly. If the scope is set to test, it's not available in any other scope than test. Could you please point me at the POM in question? So I can 'mvn compile' that project successfully and you would expect it to not compile due to some optional transitive dependency? Regards, -- Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
