I fully agree with you Stephen!
Am 2016-07-28 um 10:35 schrieb Stephen Connolly:
I don't see that this needs a special name, so I am -1 on Akasha
I like Maven Artifact Resolver API... but my only concern with the "mara"
short form is that I'll keep replaying radio satire in my head every time I
say it, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6ITDfkwKTA
What exactly is wrong with org.apache.maven.ara or
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.api if we compare with
org.apache.maven.mara to me the m in mara is redundant because we already
have the maven... so either if we want a short package name then `ara` is
better... or we want an understandable package name... same goes for
artifactIds
On 28 July 2016 at 08:13, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
Hi,
The work on Aether import is progressing: as I commented on MNG-6007
recently,
we now have to find a new name for the component at Apache. Then we'll
update
poms, documentation and git repo accordingly and we'll be ready to make
releases.
We already have first ideas, found by the PMC while working in private on
the
topic:
- Akasha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akasha
- Maven Artifact Resolver API ("mara" when used as package name or
artifactid
or in maven-mara-provider)
Does anybody have another idea?
Is there a preference in the community?
Regards,
Hervé
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
