Looks like the XML config was stripped... (?) but the remote repo I tested with 
was at the URL "http://bits.netbeans.org/nexus/content/groups/netbeans/";, 
keeping the default for everything else.

 

 

> Message du 10/08/16 20:43
> De : "Guillaume Boué" 
> A : "dev" 
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Remote repositories in unpack and copy goal of maven-dependency-plugin
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> In the current 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT version of the maven-dependency-plugin, I 
> noticed that the unpack and copy goals do not resolve artifacts from remote 
> repositories configured in the POM. This used to work in the version 2.10.
> 
>  
> 
> To reproduce the issue, it is possible to add a remote repo in a sample POM 
> file:
> 
>  
> 
>     
>         
>             netbeans
>             http://bits.netbeans.org/nexus/content/groups/netbeans/
>         
>     
> 
> 
> 
> And then configure the Dependency Plugin to unpack, for example, the artifact 
> org.netbeans.modules:org-netbeans-core:RELEASE81:nbm. The build fails in 
> version 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT of the plugin because the new netbeans repo isn't 
> taken into account, whereas the artifact is correctly downloaded if version 
> 2.10 is used. Furthermore, if the repository declaration is moved to the 
> Settings, instead of being in the POM, the repo is correctly taken into 
> account for both versions.
> 
>  
> 
> After looking at the history, it seems to have been removed by this commit:
> 
>  
> 
> https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/commit/35b9283efa241809a59fb4a828308681fb4a2afe#diff-870eb62b4a419b584383325fa9296a08
> 
>  
> 
> where the following line was removed: buildingRequest.setRemoteRepositories( 
> getRemoteRepos() );
> 
>  
> 
> Was this intended? If so, we should update the docs to reflect this change, I 
> didn't find a change regarding this.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> I re-added it locally, with the remote repositories being injected in the 
> plugin with the "project.remoteArtifactRepositories" property, and it solves 
> this issue: the repositories declared in the POM are used, alongside those 
> declared in the Settings, like usual. All the ITs still pass also.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Guillaume
> 
> 
>  
>

Reply via email to