1 non-final then the final, *if everything happens as expected*: ok, fine for me, I can live with that extra step :)
Le samedi 4 mars 2017, 08:12:35 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit : > I was only planning 1 beta. > > And if alpha-2 is good enough and we are confident we can skip the beta... > > I want to avoid RCs, we should have one take only for the actual release > > On Sat 4 Mar 2017 at 01:47, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry to open such discussion, but given the good feedback on alpha-1 > > (which > > is a good news), are alpha-2 then beta-1 then beta-2 before GA really > > useful? > > Not a little bit too much? > > Or are there really changes I don't see that require such detailed > > qualification path? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le jeudi 2 mars 2017, 21:55:29 CET Stephen Connolly a écrit : > > > I'd like to declare feature freeze for alpha-2 on March 9th. > > > > > > If a feature does not land in alpha-2 it will not be in beta-1 (i.e. > > > Only > > > bug fixes or rip out features that are causing S1/S2 issues will be in > > > > the > > > > > diff from alpha-2 to beta-1) > > > > > > I am aiming beta-2 approx 2 weeks after alpha-2 and the GA approx 2 > > > weeks > > > after that. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- > > Sent from my phone --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
